![]() Buying new AMD products is like buying used cars: it takes time, experience and a taste for sales hype. ![]() Within minutes of the first, pre-release, 7000 series userbenchmark results, AMD’s marketers broadcast a 20% win over the 12900K via thousands of anonymous twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. So if you want to own the fastest consumer CPU in the world, it would be wise to wait for the dust to settle. The more accessible pricing (albeit not accessible for the majority) and hurried release of the i9-7900k to market is widely perceived as a reaction to AMD’s Ryzen Threadripper CPUs, rumoured for release towards the end of July 2017. This all translates to the i9-7900X offering around 20% more value for money, even despite its eye-watering $999 price tag. It also betters the i7-6950X on price by around 28%. However, despite the same power draw (TDP 140W), the newer i9-7900X betters the i7-6950X in terms of peak overclocked performance by 10% mostly thanks to increased clock speeds from 3.0GHz/4.0GHz to 3.3GHz/4.3GHz for base/turbo. Both are extremely powerful and pricey high end desktop processors (HEDTs) which excel in multi-threaded tasks such as media encoding. The i9-7900X supersedes the 10-core Broadwell-E core i7-6950X that held the crown for little over a year. The 7900X is the fastest CPU on the market today, however, imminent competition from AMD’s 16-core, 32-thread Ryzen Threadripper CPUs and the forthcoming release of more Intel Core X series mean that its reign will be a short one. It's the first to bear the i9 moniker and utilize the new X299 (Basin Falls) chipset/motherboard. Windows 7 Ultimate Build 7100 圆4 | Windows 7 Ultimate Build 7100 圆4ģDM06: 19519, Vantage: P16170 ~ Win7: -CPU 7.5 -MEM 7.5 -AERO 7.9 -GFX 6.0 -HDD 6.Intel’s core i9-7900X, from the Skylake-X series, is Intel’s latest 10-core, 20-thread flagship processor. Soundmax AD2000BX Onboard Sound, via Logitech X-230 2.1 | ADI SoundMAX HD Audio Silverstone Fortress FT01B-W ~ Logitech G15 R1 / Microsoft Laser Mouse 6000 XFX GTX 285 1GB, Modded FTW BIOS 725/1512/1350 w/Accelero Xtreme GTX 280 + Scythe sinks| ATI X1250Ģx WD6400AAKS 1 TB Raid 0, 140GB Raid 1 & 80GB Maxtor Basics External HDD (storage) | 160GB 2.5" Xigmatek Dark Knight w/AC MX2 ~ Case Fans: 2 x 180mm + 1 x 120mm Silverstone FansĤGB OCZ Platinum PC2-8000 1000Mhz 5-5-5-15 2.1v | 2 x 1GB DDR2 667 MHz I did this and noticed that it's like putting a performance camshaft in a motor the RPMs are steady and the power band (extraction rate) is flat because you're working in just that one section/platter of the drive instead of having things copied over to your C drive and then back wherever they're going. ![]() You just set the temp file field to blank and click OK. The solution to the problem is so simple it's mind boggling. For most of us, this data ends right back up in the folder or a subfolder of the RAR files folder. Now, taking hard drive geography and platters into mind, you can realize that the drive is doing a lot of extra needless work, copying from wherever your data is to that temp folder and then back to where the data will end up. Why? WinRAR copies files to a temp folder, you can actually find it right there in the options. My proc doesn't even scale above 1.8GHz (It's a when extracting RAR files. If you've done what I did and upgraded your computer to something twice as fast, you may have noticed that RAR files will always be limited by your hard drive speed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |